Onision's Partner Spotted Online with a New Pseudonym and Matching Tattoos

Onision's Partner Spotted Online

Onision's Partner Spotted Online

A troubling news, reigniting past controversies, claims that Onison's long-term partner, previously known as Kai or Lucas, has reappeared on social media under a new name.

Despite his efforts to conceal his identity by covering his face in all content, the unique tattoos on his forearm have led many people to authenticate his presence on a new TikTok account, reportedly known as Geo & Gage. The account is gaining popularity, especially among young trans viewers.

gioandgage tiktok account
expand image
Credit: gioandgage | Tiktok

Lucas has been a figure of controversy for over a decade due to his relationship with YouTuber Onision, also known as Gregory Jackson. According to publicly shared accounts and online discussions, their relationship started when Lucas was a minor, raising ethical questions among his followers.

Over the years, many have accused Lucas and Onision of having inappropriate relationships with young fans, including reportedly inviting underage people into their home and engaging in questionable behavior once they were 18. Former acquaintances and spectators have publicly documented some, but not all, of these incidents; however, not all have resulted in legal action.

Currently, there hasn't been any official response or comment from the owner of the Geo & Gage account regarding the speculation about their identity. The TikTok video shared by @maiapapaiyaa hasn't mentioned any previous controversies but did highlight parallels between Lucas' known tattoos and those visible in recent TikTok videos.

The account is supposedly managed by two people, one of whom some users believe is Lucas' lifelong pal.

The internet response has been rapid, particularly among Reddit and TikTok users familiar with the historical context. Many are concerned about the idea of rebranding to engage with a new, younger audience without addressing previous allegations.

Critics argue that creators with controversial backgrounds should not be allowed to return to social media without transparency. However, supporters have emphasized the importance of not making judgments without verbal evidence.